Knocking on the Devil’s Door

Intro to Knocking on the Devil’s Door

Following the energy reactor catastrophes of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, and most recently Fukushima in Japan, nuclear energy remains a terrible specter hovering over the safety, health and well-being of millions of people around the globe.  Not only is the proliferation of nuclear weapons a lingering threat, but so is every nuclear station a ticking bomb awaiting a terrorist attack.

Yet after the all the lessons of history, the deaths of a million people following Chernobyl, according to numerous Russian studies, and the likely long-term toll of the Daiichi Fukushima plant being dramatically higher, why is the US with the most reactors in the world, so blinded by the lobbying paybacks and erroneous science of the nuclear industrial complex. Contrary to the propaganda released by the Obama administration and the energy cartel and parroted the media, nuclear energy is neither clean nor renewable.  Moreover, nuclear energy, across the stages from mining that contaminates natural habitats, rivers, and our already stressed aquifers , leaves an immense carbon footprint. It is an energy source that is utterly unsustainable for the future ahead.

In Knocking on the Devil’s Door, by award winning director Gary Null, these other disturbing issues to are treated by an extraordinary cast of scholars, scientists, physicians, activists, and global ethicists, to reveal nuclear energy as a gross violation of human rights, and an industry corrupted by money, greed and deception.

Why should terrorists bother smuggling bombs into the U.S. when, over 100 nuclear facilities lie virtually unprotected all over America – waiting to be “detonated”?

Why are licenses for worn out nuclear plants being extended behind closed doors for another 20 years, increasing the risk of a meltdown?

Many of these re-licensed plants are leaking or have leaked, polluted, radioactive, carcinogenic, tritium water.  A quarter of all US reactors have leaks.

Did you know the government plans to use $54 billion dollars, as just a down payment, to build 200 new nuclear power plants, next to every major city in America? If there were to be an accident, the liability falls completely on the taxpayers, as no insurance company will cover them. Accidents will happen; it’s only a matter of time.

We get less than 9% of our total energy needs from nuclear power.

Is it worth it?

Knock on the Devil’s Door.

Sooner or later someone is going to answer.

Fukushima makes Hiroshima look like a B-B gun

Professor Tatsuhiko Kodama, head of the Radioisotope Center at the University of Tokyo, gives emotional testimony and demands action.

From Professor Kodama’s plea:

“When we research the radiation injury/sickness, we look at the total amount of radioactive materials. But there is no definite report from TEPCO or the Japanese government as to exactly how much radioactive materials have been released from Fukushima.

“So, using our knowledge base at the Radioisotope Center, we calculated. Based on the thermal output, it is 29.6 times the amount released by the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In uranium equivalent, it is 20 Hiroshima bombs.

“What is more frightening is that whereas the radiation from a nuclear bomb will decrease to one-thousandth in one year, the radiation from a nuclear power plant will only decrease to one-tenth.

“In other words, we should recognize from the start that just like Chernobyl, Fukushima I Nuke Plant has released radioactive materials equivalent in the amount to tens of nuclear bombs, and the resulting contamination is far worse than the contamination by a nuclear bomb.”

UK’s MOX fuel plant closing

The highly controversial Sellafield MOX fuel plant in Cumbria is closing. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) made the announcement today. An uncertain future was in store for the plant as TEPCO was due to purchase 50% of the fuel, and all other potential customers were Japanese businessmen. Six hundred jobs will be lost. BusinessGreen.com

SILENT SPRING MEETS THE LONG HOT SUMMER by Kim Roberson

Kim Roberson’s latestpost on NuclearFreePlanet.org, an organization run by the Helen Caldicott foundation.

This excellent piece is both a personal journey as well as the story of an industry that is willing to lie, cheat, and sacrifice humanity in the name of profit.

From the About page of NuclearFreePlanet.org:
“The goal of Nuclear-Free Planet is far-reaching public education about the often underestimated and poorly understood medical hazards of nuclear weapons and nuclear power. Our focus is on the grave danger posed to public health by radiation, by the contribution of nuclear power to global warming, and by the real capacity of nuclear weapons, technology, and waste, to render parts or all of the earth uninhabitable forever.”

Stop business as usual!

Please tell your Senators to say no to new nuclear power plants

The nuclear industry would like to pretend Fukushima never happened. Bills are arriving in the Senate to spend more of our money on new nukes. The industry is still calling it “clean power”. Call them out on their lie and demand your Senators do the right thing. Contact your Senators via Democracy in Action or
Directly at senate.gov.

90 to 95% of Cancers are Preventable: due to lifestyle or environment

Cancer is a Preventable Disease that Requires Major Lifestyle Changes says study published in Pharmaceutical Research,
An Official Journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

The 2008 study concludes that up to 10% of total cancer cases are likely induced by radiation, both ionizing and non-ionizing. It is likely that this percentage will increase significantly in the post-Fukushima world. Radiation induced cancers include some types of leukemia, lymphoma, thyroid cancers, skin cancers, sarcomas, lung and breast carcinomas.

Women, breast cancer and nuclear power

“Breast cancer and ionizing radiation: Ionizing radiation has long been regarded as the most established environmental risk factor for breast cancer.” Article

On Radiation Truth’s Facebook page, female fans outnumber male ones by 2 to one. What do you think is the reason women are more concerned about side effects of nuclear power?

Thank you New York Times

…but shouldn’t 3 simultaneous reactor meltdowns be front page news?

I am glad to see that the tone of New York Times articles have become more critical of the nuclear industry over the last two months. The latest article describes how Anthony Sarrack, an NRC engineer pointed out serious design flaws in the design of venting systems at his reactor and others in the United States similar to the ones in Japan. His frustration led him to eventually leave the industry.

The NRC and IAEA were the experts early on in the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Now the Times is looking at these organizations with a more critical eye. If you would like to check out the articles that came up on a search of “nuclear power” visit the Times.

… for publishing “Unsafe at any Dose”

… in the April 30 magazine. In “Unsafe at any Dose” Helen Caldicott’s asks physicians to get involved, and stand up to the nuclear power lobby. “Physicists had the knowledge to begin the nuclear age. Physicians have the knowledge, credibility and legitimacy to end it.”

What is good dust hygiene?

Maggie Gunderson interviews Marco Kaltofen on his timely study of the radioactive fallout from Fukushima.

We need to demand lots more testing. Just as there are smog alerts in some big cities we need to demand nationwide fallout alerts. Please spread the word.

Where is all that Fukushima radiation going, and why does it matter? from Fairewinds Associates on Vimeo.

What can we do to help our body deal with the radiation?

Therapy for radiation exposure by Dr. Apsley

Key supplements can safely antidote radioactive iodine, plutonium, cesium, uranium and strontium from fall out, These include NAC, Kelp, Chlorella, Baking Soda, Calcium hydroxyapatite, Noni Juice, selenium, vitamin E, CoQ10, Lipoic acid, Melatonin. Look for Dr. Apsley’s book on Amazon.com in August 2011.