Congressional Committee on Nuke Safety Takes in Big Dollars From Nuclear Power Industry

Members of Congress that sit on the House Energy and Commerce and Senate Environment and Public Works committees receive an average of $9,024 per year from the nuclear industry. This is almost 3 times what other Congressmen receive from the industry.

MAPLight.org has analyzed contributions to lawmakers sitting on the above committees . See details.

Switzerland bans nukes, radiation sickness in children, large area is uninhabitable

Rather then send you 3 separate alerts, we are combining the stories.

Every day there is news from Japan. The following are a few of the most newsworthy:

• Switzerland voted recently to phase out nuclear power. This came on the heels of a 20,000 person march against nuclear power. NPR.

• An area 17 times the size of Manhattan is off limits for habitation. Let’s demand US newspapers and TV stations report this staggering news. Natural News

• Children 32 miles from Fukushima are falling sick. Many Japanese children have “inexplicable” symptoms reported Tokyo’s Shinburn newspaper.

Women, breast cancer and nuclear power

“Breast cancer and ionizing radiation: Ionizing radiation has long been regarded as the most established environmental risk factor for breast cancer.” Article

On Radiation Truth’s Facebook page, female fans outnumber male ones by 2 to one. What do you think is the reason women are more concerned about side effects of nuclear power?

MOX fuel

MOX is considered orders of magnitudes worse than the isotopes used in most reactors for a number of reasons. Here’s one reason: it contains plutonium, which has a half-life of 24,000 years. Plutonium is a by-product of nuclear energy production: it is found in the spent fuel rods of all nuclear reactors. It is sometimes added to new fuel rods is to save money and reduce the amount of waste they have to store. Learn some other nasty facts about DOX fuel in this article published by Time magazine.

Thank you New York Times

…but shouldn’t 3 simultaneous reactor meltdowns be front page news?

I am glad to see that the tone of New York Times articles have become more critical of the nuclear industry over the last two months. The latest article describes how Anthony Sarrack, an NRC engineer pointed out serious design flaws in the design of venting systems at his reactor and others in the United States similar to the ones in Japan. His frustration led him to eventually leave the industry.

The NRC and IAEA were the experts early on in the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Now the Times is looking at these organizations with a more critical eye. If you would like to check out the articles that came up on a search of “nuclear power” visit the Times.

… for publishing “Unsafe at any Dose”

… in the April 30 magazine. In “Unsafe at any Dose” Helen Caldicott’s asks physicians to get involved, and stand up to the nuclear power lobby. “Physicists had the knowledge to begin the nuclear age. Physicians have the knowledge, credibility and legitimacy to end it.”

A Deafening Silence from the US Major Media

“…managing public opinion is as serious an operation as managing the crisis itself” – Dr. Robert Jacobs, a research Associate Professor of Nuclear History and Culture at the Hiroshima Peace Institute.

Here are the latest stories from the last few days:

The crisis in Japan continues to escalate, yet US major media would have us believe all is well. There is good journalism in the US, however; thanks Tom Hartman, Gary Null and other progressive journalists covering this topic….look for them online.

Here are the latest stories from the last few days:

  • \Unit 4 is leaning to the right. “A spent fuel pool from 3 or 4 reactors. If building were to collapse, the spent fuel would just get scattered around on the ground …this would make it almost impossible for workers to remain on the site.” video on Beyond Nuclear
  • Data released on May 6th by Japanese and US authorities show that ground level radioactive cesium contamination beyond the 12 mile “no entry zone” are higher than radiation levels that led to the mandatory evacuations at Chernobyl.Asahi.com
  • Unit 3’s spent fuel appears to be gone.
  • Could this be why readings are so high, and why radioactive substances are being found in sewage sludge produced at wastewater treatment facilities in the Hiwada area of Koriyama. 500 tons of of possibly contaminated sludge was shipped out to cement companies, who use the sludge in cement production, since the disaster. Since the high levels of cesium-137 were found, shipping of the sludge has been suspended.
  • On May 10, Japanese Prime Minister Natoto Kan announced that Japan will not pursue any new nuclear power plant construction. Fourteen power plants had been planned.
  • On May 12th, TEPCO opened the main access points to Unit 1, and in doing do freely released 500 million becquerels of radioactive substances into the atmosphere, where it had gathered in the upper part of the reactor following a massive hydrogen explosion on March 12.

China rethinks nuclear power (Yayyy!)

What does this mean for renewable energy?

Currently 2% of China’s energy comes from nuclear power. China has a huge need to expand its energy supply. Plans were in place to significantly expand China’s nuclear power capacity. Since Fukushima, China has had a change of heart. China has just announced it would temporarily shelve plans to significantly expand its nuclear power capacity in order to review safety and other options. Why is this great news? It means that renewable technology will advance more quickly than predicted. We believe that with China’s new focus on renewables, they will compete economically with fossil fuels within a few years.
What do you think?